Constructing a submarine cable network spanning thousands of kilometers across challenging ocean depths is a monumental undertaking in the telecommunications industry. These modern marvels of fiber-optic technology facilitate terabit-speed data transmission, meeting the soaring demand for high-speed internet connectivity worldwide.
Subsea cable projects are complex endeavors that require meticulous planning and multinational collaboration from inception to completion.
Early-stage considerations include project structure, financing, and business viability, all of which are crucial for success. Historically, international consortiums have been pivotal, originally connecting state-owned telecom networks for global voice and data services. More recently, private entities and consortiums, including tech giants such as Meta, Google, Microsoft, and AWS, have joined, not only as capacity purchasers but also as co-owners and builders of these critical infrastructure projects.
Despite the technological advancements, subsea cable projects often face significant challenges. Project timelines, typically one-to-three years, can extend due to non-technical complications, delaying the ready-for-service (RFS) date. The costs, reaching hundreds of millions, necessitate flexibility in project management to accommodate changes over the project's lifespan. Furthermore, the geopolitical landscape adds another layer of complexity.
Addressing these challenges requires clear contractual frameworks to manage variations swiftly and accurately, ensuring minimal disruption to project delivery. From financial structuring to geopolitical considerations, effective multinational collaboration remains essential for navigating the complexities of delivering these vital networks.
Cultural Differences and Misalignment of Goals
One of the greatest challenges in implementing multinational subsea cable projects is navigating cultural differences and misaligned priorities among stakeholders from different countries. These projects often involve a mix of public and private entities, each with distinct business strategies, regulatory frameworks, and geopolitical interests.
A key issue is the ongoing competition between global powers over submarine cable ownership and security.
The United States and China have increasingly engaged in a struggle over subsea infrastructure, with cybersecurity and espionage concerns driving restrictions on Chinese involvement in cable projects. This tension has forced European policymakers to reassess their own strategies, leading to growing caution about working with certain vendors. However, Europe also faces internal conflicts, particularly in the wake of the dominance of the U.S. cloud. The rise of these hyperscalers has sparked debates over market control and European telecom firms’ ability to compete.
Historical and geopolitical tensions further complicate cooperation. Trans-Arctic cable projects, which could have provided alternative routes to ease congestion in the global network, have repeatedly failed due to geopolitical instability, regulatory challenges, and a lack of aligned interests. Projects such as the Russian Optical Trans-Arctic Submarine Cable System (ROTACS) and Arctic Connect collapsed as partners withdrew, often for political reasons. Russia’s own Polar Express project was also sidelined by geopolitical isolation following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Even when stakeholders share a common technical goal—in this case, expanding global connectivity—conflicting national interests, regulatory barriers, and economic competition often delay or derail projects.
Regulatory, Legal, and Environmental Challenges
With subsea cable projects spanning multiple jurisdictions, companies must navigate complex compliance requirements, permitting processes, and environmental regulations, all of which can impact timelines and costs.
By nature, subsea cable projects require coordination between multiple stakeholders, including private operators, government agencies, and scientific organizations. The implementation of Science Monitoring And Reliable Telecommunications (SMART) cables, for example, necessitates unprecedented collaboration between scientific institutions and cable system suppliers to enhance ocean monitoring. However, securing governmental approvals can be difficult, particularly in emerging markets where legal frameworks are less developed, regulatory processes are slow, and transparency is limited. Additionally, some nations impose localization rules, requiring foreign companies to use local professionals, which adds another layer of complexity to project execution.
Major technology companies have invested heavily in subsea infrastructure, advocating for open access and industry-wide collaboration. However, ensuring open and neutral access to these systems often requires extensive legal reviews of procurement frameworks and government financing policies. A strong legal strategy is essential to minimize the risks of regulatory roadblocks and ensure compliance with international standards.
- Challenges in Permitting
The permitting process is one of the most significant obstacles in subsea cable deployment.
From securing rights-of-way (ROW) for cable landing stations to obtaining environmental clearances, delays can lead to substantial financial losses. In some cases, the permitting process for beach manholes and cable landing stations (CLS) is straightforward at the national level but complicated at the municipal level, where local governments impose costly and time-consuming regulations.
Delays in obtaining permits not only affect project timelines but also drive up costs, particularly when specialized vessels are involved. With only around 60 cable-laying ships available worldwide, according to the International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC), scheduling conflicts can have serious financial consequences. Operators must either pay costly standby fees or risk losing ship availability to other projects.
The case of MAREA, one of the fastest subsea cables in the world with a transmission capacity of 200 Tbps, highlights the importance of efficient permit management. Streamlining the regulatory process resulted in timeous project completion, demonstrating how proactive legal planning can foster project success.
- Environmental Considerations
In many regions, environmental compliance is a key factor to consider when securing subsea cable project approvals. Saudi Arabia, for example, has strict environmental policies enforced by the Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture (MEWA) and the National Center for Environmental Compliance (NCEC). Regulations require detailed environmental impact assessments for marine projects, including submarine cables, to ensure minimal disruption to marine ecosystems.
Given the harsh and dynamic conditions of the ocean floor, legal teams must work closely with engineers to assess seabed conditions, mechanical stresses, and ecological risks. A thorough understanding of local environmental laws ensures that projects align with sustainability goals while avoiding costly legal disputes.
In an industry where time is money, regulatory and legal preparedness can mean the difference between a smooth rollout and a multi-year delay.
Risk Management
Before launching a submarine cable project, conducting a thorough risk assessment is crucial. Potential risks include route planning challenges, cable design flaws, installation difficulties, and long-term maintenance requirements. By identifying these risks early, project teams can implement redundancy and resilience measures, engage experienced partners, and develop contingency plans to address disruptions.
With this in mind, managing risks in multinational subsea cable projects requires a proactive approach to financial, operational, and regulatory uncertainties.
Given the scale of investment and complexity involved, operators must adopt robust risk mitigation strategies to ensure project viability and long-term success.
To minimize financial exposure, many cable projects now employ sophisticated structures that optimize benefits while reducing risks. Partnerships with government entities can provide essential rights and licenses, adding credibility to the project, while landing partners and onward capacity providers contribute strategic value. A key risk management strategy is securing significant capacity sales before the ready-for-service (RFS) date. Pre-sale down payments, often facilitated by landing station providers or network operators, help stabilize cash flow and mitigate uncertainties in long-term indefeasible rights of use (IRUs).
A supplier-led solution (SLS) has emerged as an effective approach to reducing both financial and operational risks. This model integrates standardized processes and subsea boosting technology, resulting in a 41% reduction in capital expenditures (CapEx) and an accelerated project schedule to a case study. Additionally, streamlined bidding processes and shorter equipment lead times enhance predictability and minimize execution risks. By leveraging a SLS, operators can lower contingency costs and improve overall project economics.
Conclusion
Submarine cable projects stand at the heart of global connectivity, enabling the seamless exchange of data across continents. However, delivering these complex infrastructure projects requires more than just cutting-edge technology; it demands strategic foresight, risk management, and multinational collaboration.
Overall, the success of a submarine cable project is not just measured by its technical achievements but by its resilience in the face of uncertainty.
By combining technological advancements with strategic risk management and international cooperation, the industry can continue to build the backbone of the digital world, ensuring connectivity for generations to come.
Learn About Threats Below the Surface: Why Subsea Cable Resilience Matters